Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 18(2): e0276651, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2265071

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A phase II = design is used to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of full dose docetaxel, platinum, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) in a sequential chemoradiation treatment locally advanced (LA) or oligometastatic (OM) NPC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with LANPC (M0 cohort) and six patients with OMNPC (M1 cohort) received induction standard dose T (75 mg/m2) P (75 mg/m2) F (750 mg/m2 IVCI x 5days) x 3 followed by weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2) or carboplatin (AUC 1.5) x 6 concurrent with radiation therapy of 70 Gy over 6.5-7 weeks. The first five patients received bevacizumab as part of an exploratory objective of hypoxia modification using correlative fluoromisonidasole (18F-MISO) PET CT scanning. RESULTS: The 18F-MISO imaging failed to reveal adequate levels of baseline hypoxia necessary to evaluate for changes with chemotherapy and bevacizumab. Ninety percent of M0 patients and 83% of M1 patients received the full-intended TPF and radiation dose. Eighty-five percent of M0 patients and all M1 patients received at least 60% of the full-intended concurrent platinum dose. The 2-year progression free survival (PFS) rate for the M0 cohort was 90% (95% CI: 77.8%- 100%), and was sustained at 5 years. The 2-year PFS rate for the M1 cohort was 66.7% (95% CI: 37.9%- 100%). The 2-year overall survival (OS) rates for the M0 and M1 cohorts were 100% and 83.3% (95% CI: 58.3%- 100%), respectively. At five years, OS was 94.4% for the M0 cohort. CONCLUSION: Administration of standard-dose TPF as induction chemotherapy in this NPC patient population is both feasible and effective when coupled with definitive concurrent chemoradiation. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00896181.


Subject(s)
Induction Chemotherapy , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms , Humans , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Fluorouracil , Induction Chemotherapy/methods , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/drug therapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Platinum/therapeutic use
3.
Lancet ; 399(10340): 2015-2030, 2022 05 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1895514

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Risankizumab, an interleukin (IL)-23 p19 inhibitor, was evaluated for safety and efficacy as induction therapy in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. METHODS: ADVANCE and MOTIVATE were randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled, phase 3 induction studies. Eligible patients aged 16-80 years with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease, previously showing intolerance or inadequate response to one or more approved biologics or conventional therapy (ADVANCE) or to biologics (MOTIVATE), were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of intravenous risankizumab (600 mg or 1200 mg) or placebo (2:2:1 in ADVANCE, 1:1:1 in MOTIVATE) at weeks 0, 4, and 8. We used interactive response technology for random assignment, with stratification by number of previous failed biologics, corticosteroid use at baseline, and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD). All patients and study personnel (excluding pharmacists who prepared intravenous solutions) were masked to treatment allocation throughout the study. Coprimary endpoints were clinical remission (defined by Crohn's disease activity index [CDAI] or patient-reported outcome criteria [average daily stool frequency and abdominal pain score]) and endoscopic response at week 12. The intention-to-treat population (all eligible patients who received at least one dose of study drug in the 12-week induction period) was analysed for efficacy outcomes. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Both trials were registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03105128 (ADVANCE) and NCT03104413 (MOTIVATE), and are now complete. FINDINGS: Participants were enrolled between May 10, 2017, and Aug 24, 2020 (ADVANCE trial), and Dec 18, 2017 and Sept 9, 2020 (MOTIVATE trial). In ADVANCE, 931 patients were assigned to either risankizumab 600 mg (n=373), risankizumab 1200 mg (n=372), or placebo (n=186). In MOTIVATE, 618 patients were assigned to risankizumab 600 mg (n=206), risankizumab 1200 mg (n=205), or placebo (n=207). The primary analysis population comprised 850 participants in ADVANCE and 569 participants in MOTIVATE. All coprimary endpoints at week 12 were met in both trials with both doses of risankizumab (p values ≤0·0001). In ADVANCE, CDAI clinical remission rate was 45% (adjusted difference 21%, 95% CI 12-29; 152/336) with risankizumab 600 mg and 42% (17%, 8-25; 141/339) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 25% (43/175) with placebo; stool frequency and abdominal pain score clinical remission rate was 43% (22%, 14-30; 146/336) with risankizumab 600 mg and 41% (19%, 11-27; 139/339) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 22% (38/175) with placebo; and endoscopic response rate was 40% (28%, 21-35; 135/336) with risankizumab 600 mg and 32% (20%, 14-27; 109/339) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 12% (21/175) with placebo. In MOTIVATE, CDAI clinical remission rate was 42% (22%, 13-31; 80/191) with risankizumab 600 mg and 40% (21%, 12-29; 77/191) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 20% (37/187) with placebo; stool frequency and abdominal pain score clinical remission rate was 35% (15%, 6-24; 66/191) with risankizumab 600 mg and 40% (20%, 12-29; 76/191) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 19% (36/187) with placebo; and endoscopic response rate was 29% (18%, 10-25; 55/191) with risankizumab 600 mg and 34% (23%, 15-31; 65/191) with risankizumab 1200 mg versus 11% (21/187) with placebo. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar among the treatment groups in both trials. Three deaths occurred during induction (two in the placebo group [ADVANCE] and one in the risankizumab 1200 mg group [MOTIVATE]). The death in the risankizumab-treated patient was deemed unrelated to the study drug. INTERPRETATION: Risankizumab was effective and well tolerated as induction therapy in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. FUNDING: AbbVie.


Subject(s)
Biological Products , Crohn Disease , Abdominal Pain , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy
5.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 44(2): e532-e536, 2022 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1270768

ABSTRACT

A 15-year-old male presented with fatigue and weight loss for 1 month, petechiae and bruising for 2 weeks. He was diagnosed with concurrent new acute myeloid leukemia and coronavirus disease 2019. He was febrile and chest computed tomography scan showed ground glass opacities. Fever resolved after 4 days. Polymerase chain reaction test for coronavirus disease 2019 became negative after 2 days. Induction chemotherapy was initiated on day 8 and was complicated by multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. The multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children was managed with symptomatic treatment and continued chemotherapy. Patient recovered and end of induction bone marrow showed remission of the leukemia.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Induction Chemotherapy/methods , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/complications , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/pathology , Adolescent , COVID-19/pathology , COVID-19/virology , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/virology , Male , Remission Induction , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/drug therapy , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/virology , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
7.
Bull Cancer ; 108(5): 490-500, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1126758

ABSTRACT

Since the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, many recommendations have been made. However, the very specific nature of acute lymphoblastic leukemias and their treatment in children and adolescents led the Leukemia Committee of the French Society for the fight against Cancers and leukemias in children and adolescents (SFCE) to propose more specific recommendations. Here is the second version of these recommendations updated according to the evolution of knowledge on COVID19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine Monophosphate/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Alanine/analogs & derivatives , Alanine/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Cancer Care Facilities , Child , Consolidation Chemotherapy , Drug Interactions , France/epidemiology , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy/methods , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Maintenance Chemotherapy/methods , Recurrence , Risk Assessment , Societies, Medical , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
8.
Radiol Med ; 126(2): 343-347, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-834039

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the paper was to assess real-life experience in the management of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in radiotherapy departments and to evaluate the variability in terms of adherence to American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In May 2020, an anonymous 30-question online survey, comparing acute phase of outbreak and pre-COVID-19 period, was conducted. Two sections exploited changes in general management of HNC patients and different HNC primary tumors, addressing specific statements from ASTRO ESTRO consensus statement as well. RESULTS: Eighty-eight questionnaires were included in the demographic/clinical workflow analysis, and 64 were analyzed for treatment management. Forty-eight percent of radiotherapy departments became part of oncologic hubs. First consultations reduced, and patients were addressed to other centers in 33.8 and 18.3% of cases, respectively. Telematic consultations were used in 50% of follow-up visits and 73.9% of multidisciplinary tumor board discussions. There were no practical changes in the management of patients affected by different primitive HNCs. Hypofractionation was not favored over conventional schedules. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to pre-COVID era, the clinical workflow was highly re-organized, whereas there were no consistent changes in RT indications and schedules.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Pandemics , Radiation Oncology/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Europe/epidemiology , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Health Care Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy , Italy/epidemiology , Radiotherapy/methods , Radiotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Radiotherapy Dosage , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Societies, Medical , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Workflow
9.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 43(6): e804-e807, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-760055

ABSTRACT

The clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) in children with hematologic malignancies is unclear. We describe the diagnosis, treatment and outcome of a 4-year-old boy with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia and COVID-19. Regardless of immunosuppressive induction chemotherapy his symptoms remained moderate. He received only supportive treatment. Seroconversion occurred in a similar period as in immunocompetent adults. Despite prolonged myelosuppression he did neither acquire secondary infections nor did the treatment delay caused by the infection have a measurable negative impact on the residual disease of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Intriguingly, residual leukemia even decreased even though he did not receive any antileukemic therapy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Induction Chemotherapy/methods , Neoplasm, Residual/prevention & control , Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , COVID-19/virology , Child, Preschool , Humans , Male , Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/pathology , Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL